Project Governance Process
The project governance process is designed to improve transparency, support effective resource planning, align technology investments with institutional priorities, and promote successful project delivery across the university.
Projects meeting one or more of the following criteria require review, approval, and prioritization before procurement or implementation:
- Estimated cost of $10,000 or more
- Combined IT staff effort of 40 hours or more
- Introduction of a significant institutional, operational or security risk
- Integration with campus data systems or substantial changes to university business processes or technology platforms aligned with university, college, or unit strategic priorities
When a college or division identifies a need for an IT solution, and funding has been identified, the requesting unit will work with the IT Director supporting its academic or administrative area to develop a business case. The proposed project must also receive approval from the appropriate college or major unit leadership, including the vice president or provost, before advancing in the process.
After leadership approval is obtained, the IT Director will submit a Project Evaluation Request to initiate the formal IT intake process. During this phase, IT evaluates the project’s technical and operational requirements, including infrastructure, integrations, data governance, accessibility, security, support and resource impacts.
Project Evaluation Requests will be reviewed on a recurring cycle, with submission deadlines of July 1, October 1, and March 1 each year.
Enterprise and large-scale initiatives may require additional documentation, business analysis, vendor evaluation, and implementation planning. In partnership with Purchasing and Contract Services, these projects may include requirements gathering with IT Business Analysts and formal project management support.
Project Governance Board
The Project Governance Board (PGB) was established to provide institution-wide oversight and prioritization of technology initiatives. Comprised of representatives from across the university, the PGB collaborates with IT directors to review, evaluate, approve and prioritize projects that involve IT resources or services.
The Executive Committee for IT Project Governance provides high-level guidance, prioritization, and decision-making for IT initiatives across the university. The committee helps ensure that IT projects stay aligned with the university’s strategic goals by reviewing priorities set by the IT Project Governance Board, making updates when needed, and promoting transparency around key initiatives.
All IT governance processes and procedures are reviewed and approved by the Executive Committee.
The committee comprises members of the President’s Cabinet, representing academic, research, and administrative areas across the university. Together, they help ensure IT efforts support the university’s most important priorities.
Members of the Executive Committee:
- Dr. Jesse Perez Mendez, Provost and Executive Vice President
- Dr. Hans Coetze, Vice President for Research
- Ethan Erickson, Vice President for Administration and Finance
- Dr. Thomas Lane, Vice President for Academic Success and Student Affairs & Dean of Students
The PGB brings together representatives from across the university, offering a wide range of perspectives and a shared commitment to the success of IT initiatives. Voting members take part in discussions and decisions, represent their campus communities and help provide context around project needs and priorities.
The chair leads the group by organizing and guiding meetings, encouraging productive discussion and keeping everyone informed about decisions and next steps.
Voting Members:- Dr. Karen Goos: Vice Provost, Enrollment Management
- Grant Hill: Deputy Chief of Staff, External Engagement
- Shanna Leglieter: Chief Human Resources Officer
- Paul Lowe: Associate Vice President, Research
- Dr. Margaret Mohr-Schroeder: Vice Provost, Academic Affairs and Innovation
- Bill Watts: Associate Vice President, Academic and Career Engagement
- Fran Wilbrant: Associate Vice President, Division of Financial Services
- Nate Scherman: Director, IT Governance and Portfolio Management
- Thomas Bunton: Chief Information Officer
Project requestors and IT analysts work together to develop the executive summary, scorecard, and financial and labor estimates. This collaboration provides the PGB with the information it needs to evaluate projects and determine their priorities.
The goal of this process is to make sure the most important projects are staffed first, while also considering the availability of both technical and functional team members.
| ASAP | These projects are mandatory and encompass regulatory, compliance, security and critical institutional initiatives. |
| One | Priority One projects directly impact enrollment, retention, revenue generation and reduce labor by implementing efficiencies. |
| Two | Priority Two projects have value, but they do not directly address the highest priority needs. |
| Three | Priority Three includes small projects with clear value that will proceed as time and resources permit. |