Faculty Academic Dishonesty Survey Preliminary Report*

Legend:

KSU = Kansas State University
No CS = Not an Honor Code School
CS = An Honor Code School

What do you think the majority of Kansas State students would do if they saw another student cheating on a major test or examination? (Check one choice.)

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Report cheaters

5
8
24

Ask cheater to report themselves

0
1
7

Express disapproval

9
13
14

Tell others

64
56
38

Ignore the incident

21
22
15

Other

1
1
2

If someone asked a student for help during a test or exam, how do you think most Kansas State students would respond? (Please check one choice.)

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Give him/her the answer

0
2
1

Say nothing but expose their paper so he/she can copy the answer

7
11
3

Ignore or turn down the request

70
66
65

Express disapproval informally but not report him/her

20
17
25

Report him/her to the instructor or other appropriate authority

0
1
7

Other

3
3
1

How likely do you think that:

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Students are unlikely to report cheating

90
87
61

Students are unlikely to report a friend

87
97
91

How would you rate (options=very low, low, high, very high):

% Faculty rating each statement "low" or "very low"

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Competitiveness for grades

33
35
10

Student pressure to get good grades

26
23
8

Severity of penalties for cheating

62
58
28

Chances of getting caught cheating

70
78
68

Student understanding of policies

65
60
17

Faculty understanding of policies

33
38
16

Faculty support of policies

18
30
16

Effectiveness of policies

76
67
47

% Faculty who agree with the following statement:

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Faculty members show little uniformity in addressing cheating

54
49
38

Faculty don't try hard to catch cheating

40
39
43

Cheating is a serious problem at KSU

28
27
22

Judicial process is fair and impartial

66
56
46

Students should be held responsible for monitoring the cheating of others

59
58
70

Measure likely taken if student is convicted of cheating on a major test or examination. Measure likely taken if student is convicted of cheating on a majorwritten assignment. The percentages for major written assignments are written in parentheses (x) in red.

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Reprimand the student and warn not to do again

5 (10)
6 (6)
3 (3)

Make student retake exam or assignment

11 (14)
7 (11)
2 (3)

Fail student on exam or assignment

41 (52)
37 (49)
30 (39)

Fail student in the course

21 (14)
13 (15)
31 (29)

Put a written warning in file or place on probation

9 (3)
18 (7)
13 (10)

Suspend student from school

5 (0)
4 (4)
8 (7)

Expel student from school

1 (0)
1 (1)
1 (2)

Other

0 (0)
2 (2)
4 (2)

Don't know

7 (8)
12 (5)
8 (5)

Students have different views on what constitutes cheating and what is acceptable behavior. In a typical academic year, how often have you observed any of the following behaviors in your class. How serious do you consider this form of cheating? Data are given in % of faculty who answered observing one or more instances of each behavior. Data given for seriousness of cheating (%) are given in parentheses (x).

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Copying on test w/o other's knowledge

45 (3)
46 (9)
28 (7)

Copying on test w/ other's knowledge

27 (0)
30 (3)
18 (3)

Using unpermitted crib notes

33 (3)
27 (4)
13 (3)

Getting Q/A from someone who has taken a test

38 (10)
38 (24)
22 (13)

Helping someone cheat on a test

22 (8)
23 (8)
8 (4)

Cheating on a test in any other way

31 (6)
27 (8)
18 (7)

Copying material, almost word for word, from any source for one's own work

70 (10)
74 (9)
63 (7)

Fabricating or falsifying a bibliography

25 (16)
37 (18)
23 (20)

Turning in work done by someone else

44 (0)
48 (2)
36 (2)

Receiving substantial, unpermitted help on an assignment

44 (32)
47 (33)
40 (26)

Working on an assignment with others when the instructor asked for individual work

48 (48)
51 (51)
46 (42)

Copying a few sentences of material without footnoting them in a paper

62 (57)
70 (59)
61 (59)

Writing or providing a paper for another

19 (3)
25 (4)
11 (3)

Turning in a paper obtained from "paper mill" or web site

9 (8)
20 (8)
12 (9)

Plagiarizing a paper in any way using the Internet as a source

23 (10)
31 (9)
24 (11)

Copying a computer program as own

18 (9)
19 (9)
16 (6)

Falsifying lab or research data

14 (1)
12 (5)
11 (4)

In the past two years, which of the following actions have you taken in response to incidents of cheating?

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Changing a student's grade

34
44
25

Referring matter to appropriate authority

15
29
29

Referring matter to your Chair

19
26
13

Reprimanding the student

56
60
35

Other

4
8
6

Please explain your level of satisfaction with the handling of suspected cases of cheating that you have referred to your Chair, the Dean of Students, or someone else:

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Never reported

46
36
35

Satisfied

22
29
33

Very satisfied

12
12
13

Not satisfied

7
8
7

Other

13
15
12

What safeguards do you employ to reduce cheating in your courses?

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

None, I do not use any special safeguards

4
6
9

Ask for IDs before administering an exam

6
3
2

Make copies of exams before returning them to students

6
8
8

Use the Internet to confirm plagiarism

14
16
7

Provide information on syllabus about cheating/plagiarism

78
61
51

Change exams regularly

88
80
73

Collect Blue Books, mark them, and redistribute them at the start of an exam

3
5
2

Hand out different versions of an exam

48
50
32

Discuss your views on the importance of honesty and academic integrity with your students

63
63
57

Remind students periodically about their obligations under your school's academic integrity policy

58
52
56

Tell students about methods you will use to detect and deter cheating in your course

23
27
14

Other

25
34
29

What role do you think faculty should play in controlling academic dishonesty in their courses (e.g., monitor classroom cheating, develop measures to protect against cheating)?

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Monitor/protect against

51
43
28

Be active

15
13
6

Set standards

4
5
4

Proctor

4
5
6

Other

26
34
56

Do you think an honor code does/would work?

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Does/would

34
39
65

Suggestions on how Kansas State might improve its policies concerning issues of academic dishonesty:

% KSU
% No CS
% CS

Continue as is

25
26
32

Dialogue on issue

16
12
9

Implement clearer policy

0
5
1

Promulgate a code

0
5
1

Other

59
52
58

Qualitative Faculty Comments

*Donald L. McCabe. 1999 Fall Semester Academic Dishonesty Survey Study conducted at Kansas State University.