Written and Reflective Assessments

Written and reflective assessments are essential tools for measuring and enhancing student learning by moving beyond simple recall to cultivate critical thinking and deep engagement. This section explores four powerful methods, including essays, journaling, self-assessment, and case studies. These assessment strategies directly assess a student's ability to synthesize information, construct arguments, and reflect upon their own educational journey.

If you'd like to consult with instructional designers about designing and creating an alternative assessment, please feel free to email idteam@ksu.edu.

Essay

What is it? Students write to share key events and their understanding about a topic. Essays can range from short reflective pieces to extended research papers, and they typically require students to go beyond simply reporting information to analyzing, interpreting, or evaluating it. It can be helpful to focus on the process of essay writing, by breaking the assignment into smaller sections, rather than solely the product. Essays can be independent or collaborative in nature.

Why is it Effective? Essays are a direct way to assess a student's ability to synthesize information, construct an argument, and communicate complex ideas clearly. They reveal not just what students know, but how they think, showing you their reasoning process, how they connect ideas, and whether they can support claims with evidence.

How to Implement:

Scaffolding Writing Assignments: Instead of assigning one high-stakes paper at the end of the semester, consider creating a series of lower-stakes assignments, such as brainstorms, outlines, and smaller drafts. By breaking down writing assignments into manageable steps, you can design each assignment to reinforce the previous one while adding a new layer of complexity. This also reduces stress for nervous writers.
Crafting an Effective Thesis Statement: One example of a smaller assignment is to help students craft their thesis statement. You can utilize the Opening Statement plus Three (OS+3) method, by asking students to rephrase the assessment question to reflect their overall position and to provide the three main themes or ideas the paper will cover.

Resources:

Journaling (Learning Log)

What is it? Students take notes over course units, and teachers monitor the progression of those notes. Unlike traditional note-taking that simply records information, learning logs ask students to document their thinking process, questions, connections to prior knowledge, and moments of confusion or breakthrough. Instructors can review these learning logs periodically to gauge how students are processing course material.

Why is it Effective? They encourage students to engage in "Reflection-on-action," which involves looking back on an experience to analyze and reflect upon their learning. This is a powerful system for student feedback. When students articulate their understanding in their own words, they can identify gaps in their knowledge rather than passively consuming content. Instructors can gain insight into common misconceptions before high-stakes assessments, so the instructions can be adjusted accordingly.

How to Implement:

Low-Stakes, High-Frequency Reflection: Assign short, informal "writing-to-learn" activities (like 5-minute free writes, one-minute papers, or learning logs) that focus purely on metacognition and critical thinking rather than grammar or structure. This ensures the journal is a tool for deep reflection and knowledge retention, preventing it from becoming a source of grading stress for students or instructors.

Establish a Recurring, Focused Feedback System: To make the journal a "Powerful Student Feedback System," require regular (e.g., weekly) submission and commit to providing recurring, focused feedback. Teachers should use time-efficient methods, such as a single, targeted comment or using the minimal marking approach, to ensure feedback is consistent, keeps the system productive, and directly addresses student conceptual struggles.

Utilize Learning Management Systems for Digital Implementation: Leverage Canvas, K-State's Learning Management System (LMS), Google Sites, or a class blog to digitize the journal process. This makes submission, organization, and the provision of recurring feedback more efficient, especially in a higher education setting where assignments are often managed digitally.

Resources:

Self-Assessment

What is it? Students reflect on their own learning and progress, often utilizing checklists or rubrics. This can take the form of rubric-based self-scoring, reflective questionnaires about their process, or written analyses of how well they met specific learning objectives. Instructors can require students to submit these self-assessments alongside their work, making the metacognitive process visible and accountable.

Why is it Effective? Students improve their critical thinking, writing, and editing skills. Self-assessment, when rooted in reflection, allows students to gain insight into their learning process. When students are asked to articulate why their work meets (or doesn't meet) certain standards, they internalize those standards in ways that passive reception of grades never achieves.

How to Implement:

Rubric-Based Self-Scoring: Create a structured self-assessment form that mirrors learning objectives, asking students to rate themselves on each criterion and provide specific evidence from their work to justify each rating.

Use Reflective Prompts: Encourage reflection-in-action by asking students to record moments when they felt "stuck" (indeterminacy) or when something went particularly well in the process.

Formal Self-Assessment: Assign a final "cover letter" or "memo" to the instructor accompanying the finished product, which describes their writing process and how well they achieved their goals.

Resources:

Case Studies

What is it? In-depth analyses of a particular situation or problem where students apply their knowledge. They present a real organizational issue for students to analyze and respond to. Students work with authentic scenarios with complex variables and incomplete information that mirror what professionals encounter in the field. Case studies can be drawn from published cases, news articles, historical events, or situations the instructors anonymized from their own professional experience.

Why is it Effective? Case studies simulate real-life situations, allowing students to apply theoretical knowledge without real-world pressure. This format develops reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making skills. Because cases rarely have one "correct" answer, these activities teach students to defend their reasoning and consider alternative approaches. This can prepare them for the ambiguity and complexity they'll face after graduation.

How to Implement:

Structure Collaborative Inquiry with Defined Roles: Require students to generally follow steps such as identifying a problem, generating a hypothesis, constructing an enquiry plan, and interpreting findings. Provide a consistent framework, such as "situation analysis, problem identification, alternatives evaluation, recommendation, and implementation plan". To maximize student engagement and peer learning, structure the case activity around small-group collaboration. Utilize interactive approaches—such as Jigsaw (where groups become "experts" on one part and teach others), Debate, or Role-Play—and assign student roles (e.g., discussion starter, facilitator, recorder) to ensure all learners take ownership of the discussion.

Design for Relevance and Complexity: Select relevant, complex problem situations that are appropriate for the concepts being taught. Ensure the case includes both facts and the opinions/views of the people involved to simulate real-world ambiguity and encourage higher-order thinking and application of course knowledge.

Conclude with Reflection and Comparison: Do not immediately provide a solution. Instead, conclude the activity by requiring student reflection on what and how they learned. If a real-world outcome exists, disclose the actual decision after students have developed their own conclusions, enabling them to compare their analysis with the outcomes and build metacognitive skills.

Resources: