K-State Perspectives flag
Home            Back to index

 

Kansas will test its agroterrorism response plans

By Kay Garrett

 

The state of Kansas emergency operations center was activated Wednesday and Thursday, June 18-19, 2003 in Topeka as a test of county- and state-level emergency response plans meant to handle a bioterrorism attack on Kansas' livestock or crops.

Exercise headquarters is the State Defense Building, 2800 S.W. Topeka Blvd.

The National Agricultural Biosecurity Center at Kansas State University, in tandem with USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, organized the exercise.

"Especially since 9-11, USDA-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, has recognized that the nation's agricultural sector could be vulnerable to bioterrorism attacks," said Jerry Jaax, DVM. "Consequently, emergency planning and response programs at all levels of government have been ramped up."

Jaax is the principal investigator on the grant that established the National Agricultural Biosecurity Center as a partnership of Kansas State University, Texas A&M University and Purdue University.

Participants in the Kansas exercise will be the county-, state- and federal-level personnel who would have a role and responsibility if an actual agricultural emergency occurred.

They include county emergency planning personnel and local county officials; representatives of the Kansas Division of Emergency Management; Kansas Animal Health Department; Health and Environment: Wildlife and Parks; with limited federal participation by representatives from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the FBI, Department of Justice, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and Department of Homeland Security.

Participants will be responding to reports of a foreign animal disease outbreak in southwestern Kansas. Details like the location or how the disease was introduced will be given to participants as the two-day simulation unfolds.

Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts has long recognized the critical nature of threats to the nation's agriculture, and he has been an articulate proponent of improving the protective programs, Jaax said. Sen. Roberts was instrumental in securing funding to create the National Agricultural Biosecurity Center.

"This past September I played the role of the president during a USDA exercise that featured an attack of Foot and Mouth Disease by terrorists," Roberts said. "That exercise was extremely helpful in demonstrating the severity of the spread of the disease, the economic chaos it would create, and the steps needed to protect American agriculture.

"The exercise in Kansas in June will prove most valuable in helping us to guard against this threat," he added.

Current preparedness

All Kansas counties have written emergency action plans to deal with tornado, fire, train wrecks and other civil emergencies. But there is no set of standard operating procedures for responding to possible agricultural emergencies.

Currently, only Ford County has a written plan, while Finney and Grant counties are completing written plans. All three will test their emergency response plans during the June exercise. Many other Kansas counties are at various stages of planning.

Why is a training exercise necessary in Kansas?

According to Dr. Jerry Jaax, "The goal is to replicate how such an event would actually be managed if it were to occur. We are testing the response plans — are they adequate, can we identify shortcomings, gaps, or disconnects between the plans of participants at different levels of government?

"This exercise tests the coordination and communication among the various agencies," Jaax said. "Response plans and ultimately response capabilities will be improved as a result of the exercise."

This is the first in a series of National Agricultural Biosecurity Center-led exercises to test and strengthen state- and county-level readiness to respond to a significant agricultural disease event. Information from the exercises will constitute a federal clearinghouse of "lessons learned," a resource to other states and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service in developing similar agricultural emergency response plans.

An ag emergency calls for new strategies and new teams

"First responders to an agricultural emergency would likely be people out in the counties," Jaax noted, "the ranchers, livestock managers, veterinarians and extension agents are likely to be key players when a disease is first spotted.

"Time is so critical in the initial stages of an infectious disease outbreak," Jaax said. "To lessen the impact and contain a disease effectively, local participants have to have planned ahead. Consequently, a solid emergency response plan is a must."

Dr. Marty Vanier added that emergency planners are, for the first time, preparing for an altogether new kind of emergency — the deliberate introduction of livestock disease, a crop disease of suspicious origins, or insects and pests foreign to Kansas.

Agricultural emergency response teams will be made up of people who really have little or no experience trying to work together — veterinarians, plant pathologists, extension agents and others, as well as typical first responders from transportation and emergency medical personnel.

Jaax says preparedness is not only about 'the bad guys'

Jaax said the simulation exercise is doubly useful: a strong, well-thought-out response plan bolsters overall capability to react to any disease outbreaks, intentional or naturally occurring.

"Response plans are not just something we need in case of intentional disease introduction by the bad guys," Jaax said.

Potentially serious livestock and crop diseases are always a natural threat to our agricultural infrastructure. Throw in the potential for diseases that could affect animals and humans, the zoonotics, and the picture becomes much more complex.

Recent notable examples include the emergence of West Nile virus in the United States, and new outbreaks of avian influenza in California, and the Shenandoah Valley.

"The emergence of SARS in China and its subsequent spread to other countries is a wake-up call to our public health community," Jaax said.

"If an agricultural disease is detected, the appropriate response elements such as the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, state health departments and others are mobilized to respond in proportion to the magnitude of the situation," he noted.

Homeland security institute designs the Kansas simulation

The simulation exercise developer is the ANSER Institute for Homeland Security, a company with a national reputation for high-level defense simulation exercises for federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Dr. Marty Vanier said an outside consultant strengthens the drill: "An outside developer throws curve balls, the surprise elements that will really test the preparedness plans.

"State and county planners will be getting extremely beneficial feedback in terms of identifying strong and weak points of the emergency plans they've written."

National Agricultural Biosecurity Center develops training CD

The National Agricultural Biosecurity Center is developing a CD-based training program with a template to help Kansas counties draw up and evaluate written emergency response plans. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service will use the CD to prepare counties all over the country.

A sample problem in the CD training program might be: if the state's emergency plan says "stop all agricultural traffic in your county," how are you going to implement that order?

"That's the kind of thinking and planning that has to happen to create an effective response plan," Vanier said. "The CD will provide counties with a cost-effective tool for getting started."

 

 

Winter 2003