Class Notes – Section BR (3/15)
 
Some pro/con issues for Debate Essay on the social causes of teen violence:
1. Media influence (music/tv/film)
2. Glorification of violence [James]
3. Computer games [Leo]
4. Issues of dominance in society(white males rule the minorities) [Steinem; James]
5. Issues of fitting into a society (peer society at school)
6. Easy access to weapons [James]
7. Parental roles [Males, Shelton]
8. Role models (teachers, celebrities, sports stars, politicians, siblings, historically great people, etc.)
9. Decline of moral strictures in society as a whole
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In-Class Collaborative Work on Readings by Males, Steinem, and Shelton
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MIKE MALES
1. Identify the author and title of the essay your group is responding to. Then, indicate what the author identifies as the social cause of teen violence.
 
The essay is titled Stop Blaming Kids and TV written by Mike Males. Males debates the issue that parents and other adults are as to blame for kid’s actions because of the examples they set.
 
2. Identify the sub-claims (reasons) the author offers in support of his or her main claim, and create a working thesis statement for the author’s argument. (“Author argues that X is [X and Y are] the main cause[s] of teen violence because of A, B, and C.”)
 
Males argues that parents are a larger and more consistent source of influence on children then TV and other outside sources.
 
3. What are the warrants (underlying assumptions, beliefs, values) of the author’s argument? Identify at least two.
 
Males is assuming that every child has an adult influence in their lives. Males is also assuming that children look to parents as a role model.
 
4. Evaluate the quality and quantity of the author’s evidence for his or her claims. Select one example that works and one that doesn’t work well, and explain why.
 
Males presents strong evidence.For example when he states that TV violence affects people differently so, he concludes that there must be some other influence.
 
5. List below how you could refute the author’s…
 
...warrants (underlying assumptions, beliefs, values):
 
We argue that kids use other peers as role models rather than their parents.
 
…grounds (evidence):
 
 
Males could also present better evidence regarding what time shows are on, what channels the show is on, and what programs are surrounding these shows.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GLORIA STEINEM
1. Identify the author and title of the essay your group is responding to. Then, indicate what the author identifies as the social cause of teen violence.
 
Author- Gloria Steinem
Title – supremacy crimes
Argument – supremacy is a cause of teen violence
 
 
2. Identify the sub-claims (reasons) the author offers in support of his or her main claim, and create a working thesis statement for the author’s argument.  (“Author argues that X is [X and Y are] the main cause[s] of teen violence because of A, B, and C.”)
- demographics = white heterosexual males of the middle class
- dominance is presented as a natural right for white, heterosexual, middle class males
- media’s failure to deal with racism and sexism propagates supremicy.
 
3. What are the warrants (underlying assumptions, beliefs, values) of the author’s argument? Identify at least two.
- a cultural hierarchy exists in our society, dealing with race and sex etc
- dominance is presented as a natural right for white, heterosexual, middle class males
 
4. Evaluate the quality and quantity of the author’s evidence for his or her claims.  Select one example that works and one that doesn’t work well, and explain why.
 
Works - quotes dealing with why people committed the crimes that they did in paragraphs 4 and 5.  It bridges the gap between a claim and a cause
Doesn’t – Quote about minorities also able to commit similar atrocities.  It begins to refute her supremacy argument.
 
5. List below how you could refute the author’s…
 
...warrants (underlying assumptions, beliefs, values):
- There are other possible causes for the violence. Supremacy is not necessarily the reason the white males killed.
- prove that minorities kill as well, for similar reasons.
 
…grounds (evidence):
- the quotes could have been taken out of context
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CHUCK SHELTON
 
1. Identify the author and title of the essay your group is responding to.  Then, indicate what the author identifies as the social cause of teen violence.
 
Chuck Shelton
“When White Boys Kill White Dads Fail”
few white male role models for white heterosexual males under the age of 18
 
2. Identify the sub-claims (reasons) the author offers in support of his or her main claim, and create a working thesis statement for the author’s argument.  (“Author argues that X is [X and Y are] the main cause[s] of teen violence because of A, B, and C.”)
 
the majority of these sorts of crimes are committed by middle class white boys, with Gatz.
 
3. What are the warrants (underlying assumptions, beliefs, values) of the author’s argument?  Identify at least two.
 
Males require a greater amount of paternal influence then is realized
Males are targeted by society to become this sort of criminal
 
Also:
White men are the only ones who can help white boys.
 
4. Evaluate the quality and quantity of the author’s evidence for his or her claims.  Select one example that works and one that doesn’t work well, and explain why.
 
The quality of the stats are far from spectacular, the author uses a 1988 stat for societal values.
What works: 100%/35% stat
 
5. List below how you could refute the author’s…
 
...warrants (underlying assumptions, beliefs, values):
 
they’re perfectly decent human beings (male) raised by their mother or any other person for that matter
 
Also:
Maybe men of other races or ethnicities have more influence over white boys than white men (hip-hop, rap, street culture).
 
[Maybe men who aren’t fathers – other kinds of mentors – have more influence over white boys.]
 
…grounds (evidence):
 
Doesn’t present any substantial evidence.