English 320:  Introduction to the Short Story

Criteria for evaluating answers to questions on exams.

There is a more extended version of these remarks.  You may wish to consult it for explanations in detail.

As to the question you choose to answer:

• Do you insightfully detect the issues it raises?
  
• Do you address those issues in a forthright way?
  
• Did you stick to the question as written?
  

As to the facts of the story that you mention:

• Do you formulate them in a definite and clear way?
  
• Do you get the facts straight?  I.e., are your representations of them accurate?
  
• Are the facts you introduce relevant to the issues that the question you've chosen requires you to address?  (If so, is that relevance clear?)
  

As to the interpretive inferences you bring forward in the course of your answer:

• First of all, of course, there have to actually be some!  Are there any?
  
• Are the interpretive inferences you make relevant to the question you are addressing?  (If so, is their relevance clear?)
  
• Do you unify your interpretive inferences - that is, do you integrate them within some overall focus?  And is what you say coherent?

   

  • Do you proceed by an intelligible (logical and relevant) organizational strategy?

   

  • Do we consistently see logical and insightful transitions?

     For explanation in detail, consult the extended version of these remarks.

  Suggestions are welcome.  Please send your comments to lyman@ksu.edu .

      Contents copyright © 1997 by Lyman A. Baker. 

Permission is granted for non-commercial educational use; all other rights reserved.

  This page last updated 08 September 2001.

  URL:  file:///C:/My Documents/English 320/Web Course/320eval2s.htm