From:
BARNETT Brian <bbarnett@ci.springfield.or.us>
To: geno@ce.ksu.edu
Copies to: MAYES Kristi <kmayes@ci.springfield.or.us>
Subject: Re: itetraffic roundabouts
Date sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:11:00 -0700
Gene,
We have one roundabout designed and out to bid
for construction in a few weeks with city funds
and three that are proposed by a developer and
will be built this summer. The triplet of
roundabouts will be funded 1/3 by city and 2/3 by
developer/land owner since it is a new road link.
Please contact me or Kristi if you need
additional info.
Brian
F. Barnett, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
City of Springfield
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Telephone: 541-726-3681
Facsimile: 541-736-1021
Email: bbarnett@ci.springfield.or.us
Web:
www.ci.springfield.or.us
Design Specifications for the
above mentioned Roundabouts
From:
BARNETT Brian <bbarnett@ci.springfield.or.us>
To: geno@ce.ksu.edu
Copies to: MAYES Kristi <kmayes@ci.springfield.or.us>
Subject: Re: itetraffic roundabouts
Date sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:27:00 -0700
Gene,
Single circulating lane with truck apron,
replaces through/right and left turn lanes on 3
approach legs. One leg local, one leg collector,
two legs minor arterial (they really act like
collectors) residential area near a high school
and middle school.
Prior
control: Two Way Stop sign.
All
concrete (not just the truck apron), extensive
landscaping, new lighting, incorporates bike
lanes from 3 legs in to approach to r-bout.
Design
vehicle = WB-50 but WB-67 will be able to
traverse with out damaging landscaping or signs.
Project
purpose: signal not warranted for a long time;
concern for pedestrian crossing, major leg not
stopped left turn delay and major leg stopped
delay (the major flow is on the east and north
legs); demonstration of roundabout.
Kristi,
please email condensed drawing to Gene and add
any comments you like.
Brian
F. Barnett, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
City of Springfield
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Telephone: 541-726-3681
Facsimile: 541-736-1021
Email:
bbarnett@ci.springfield.or.us
Web:
www.ci.springfield.or.us
From:
"Mark Lutjeharms" <mlutj@schemmer.com>
To: <geno@ce.ksu.edu>
Subject: roundabouts
Date sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 07:37:38 -0500
There
are a few roundabouts in the planning stages in
Lincoln, Nebraska.
One
of them (33rd Street/Sheridan Boulevard) is
through the design phase and is scheduled for
construction to begin later this Spring.
Our
company is currently in the design phase of two
others (49th/Francis, West Fletcher Avenue). If
you want further information, a gentleman by the
name of Virendra Singh (City of Lincoln Public
Works Department, Engineering Services Division)
is involved with all of them. His number is (402)
- 441- 7835.
Mark
E. Lutjeharms, P.E.
Manager, Traffic Engineering
The
Schemmer Associates Inc.
Architects-Engineers
1919
South 40th Street, Suite 302
Lincoln, NE 68506-5248
402-488-2500
402-488-3221 (fax)
From:
rlewis@ci.bend.or.us
Subject: Re: itetraffic roundabouts
To: geno@ksu.edu
Date sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:22:14 -0700
Hi Gene,
Here
in Bend Oregon, we have a policy recently handed
down by the City Council to examine the
feasibility of a roundabout every time we are
considering a traffic signal. And if the
roundabout is proven to be feasible, that will be
the preferencial treatment to start with. We have
recently passed a development agreement with
several developers who have been given permission
to build their subdivisions as long as they build
several intersection improvements. They have
chosen roundabouts and have constructed one
already and are beginning design on the remaining
eight. There are two others being designed now in
other parts of town.
We
have tons of design questions and would love an
opportunity to participate in a sort of chat room
or chat email system if you know of one...
Thanks,
Robin
Lewis
City Traffic Engineer
City of Bend
From:
"Williams, Robert (PWD)" <rbw@co.miami-dade.fl.us>
To: "'geno@ksu.edu'" <geno@ksu.edu>
Subject: TRAFFIC CIRCLES & ROUNDABOUTS IN
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY as of April 26, 1999
Date sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:03:30 -0400
I
don't know of any source of information for the
entire country, but I'm happy to contribute what
I know about our county. I'm not too expert on
thedifferences between the two circularly shaped
roadways, but if I had toguess, I'd say we have
three of each:
TRAFFIC
CIRCLES
Curtiss
Pkwy, Royal Poinciana, Westward Dr., &
Palmetto Dr. in Miami Springs
Ponce de Leon @ Sevilla & Palermo in Coral
Gables
Old Cutler Rd., LeJeune Rd., Sunset Dr., &
Cocoplum Rd.
ROUNDABOUTS
Pinecrest
& South Drives in Miami Springs
Glendale & Beverly Drives in Miami Springs
DeSoto & Labaron Drives in Miami Springs
Robert
B. Williams, P.E.
Traffic Control Center Eng.
Miami-Dade Public Works
rbw@co.miami-dade.fl.us
305-592-8925*247
From: KC-Mike Wahlstedt mrwahlstedt@transystems.com
To: "'Gene Russell '"
Subject: roundabouts
Date sent: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:50:59 -0500
We are getting ready to start design on a couple of
roundabout projects in
the KC area. As you are aware, the devil is in the
details in roundabout
design. I have done quite a bit of research on design,
but would like to
not be an example of what not to do. Therefore, I am
looking for an
experienced designer to "look over my shoulder" on these.
Are you familiar
with firms that provide these services to other
consultants?
I know about Wallwork and have heard of Doctors. Are you
familiar
with any others who are "experts" and would provide peer
review?
Thanks for your assistance...
Mike Wahlstedt
TranSystems Corp.
Kansas City
From: Gene Russell [mailto:geno@ce.ksu.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 9:56 PM
To: Itetraffic@lists.io.com
Cc: Greg Luttrell; Kalyan Sakhamuri
Subject: itetraffic roundabouts
We (Kansas State University) have been conducting research on
roundabouts for three years for Kansas DOT, Insurance Institute
and others. I conjunction with these efforts we have been
developing a web site (www.ksu.edu/roundabouts) and have an
interest in keeping up ( as much as possible and for
as long as
possible ) with the growth of roundabouts in the USA and,
although the web site is now a work in progress (constructive
comments are welcome), develop it into sort of a
clearinghouse for
anybody seeking information on roundabouts. For example,
anyone of you know for sure how many roundabouts are now in
operation in the USA ? Kittleson developed a really nice
web site a
few years ago with information on all known sites, at
that time 90,
but that has not been added to since then. There are
other sites we
have links to that cover certain areas or specific
roundabouts, etc.,
but it is hard to get a good grip on the current state of their
development and studies being conducted on them. Talking with
Michael Wallwork, and others, the numbers today are no more
than a guess of between 200 and 400. (anybody have a more
definitive number?) Since they are being installed by many
different agencies, there is no one agency in a state to
get a good
list in any given state. This is a request for
information on all those
any of you know about in your area and whatever information
(jurisdiction, type, contact, picture or article if
possible, etc.) you
can supply us with on existing or planned roundabouts and or
roundabout study results or studies being conducted. Your help
would be greatly appreciated and the results available to
all. We
are, of course, a non profit, equal opportunity
organization, doing
this with our own limited resources mostly out of
curiosity, but as a
potential public service as well. Thanks. Gene Russell
Eugene R.(Gene) Russell,Mark and Margaret Hulings
Professor, Department of
Civil Engineering, 2118 Fiedler Hall, Manhattan, KS
66506-29
05
From: "Williams, Robert (PWD)" rbw@co.miami-dade.fl.us
To: "'geno@ksu.edu'" geno@ksu.edu
Subject: TRAFFIC CIRCLES & ROUNDABOUTS IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY as of April 26, 1999
Date sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:03:30 -0400
I don't know of any source of information for the entire
country, but I'm
happy to contribute what I know about our county. I'm
not too expert on the
differences between the two circularly shaped roadways,
but if I had to
guess, I'd say we have three of each:
TRAFFIC CIRCLES
Curtiss Pkwy, Royal Poinciana, Westward Dr., & Palmetto
Dr. in Miami Springs
Ponce de Leon @ Sevilla & Palermo in Coral Gables
Old Cutler Rd., LeJeune Rd., Sunset Dr., & Cocoplum
Rd.
ROUNDABOUTS
Pinecrest & South Drives in Miami Springs
Glendale & Beverly Drives in Miami Springs
DeSoto & Labaron Drives in Miami Springs
Robert B. Williams, P.E.
Traffic Control Center Eng.
Miami-Dade Public Works
rbw@co.miami-dade.fl.us
305-592-8925*247
From: Phil.Jordan@roads.vic.gov.au
Subject: Re: GREETINGS
To: geno@ksu.edu
Date sent: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:07:24 +1000
Hi Gene,
Great to hear from you. I trust you are keeping fit and
well.
I can happily send you a number of roundabout photos -
please give me time
to do this.
Secondly - if you want an Aussie "expert" - some people
consider me to be
such a person!! A suggestion - why not consider running
a one or two day
"awareness" raising course on roundabouts. You already
have some very good
people in North America, including Mike Wallwork and
others - pick a time
which suits them and me in 2002 and we can help to
promote the safe use of
an excellent traffic control device (the roundabout).
I look forward to seeing you here next Feb - I am on the
Steering Committee
and we have started to put together a very good
program.
Lots of hot weather at that time of the year down here.
Give me a few days
- will send photos 2-3 at a time.
Cheers for now,
Phil
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 18:58:19 -0500
From: Gene Russell geno@ce.ksu.edu
Reply-To: geno@ksu.edu
To: Phil.Jordan@roads.vic.gov.au
Cc: Sheila L Willms slw5236@ksu.edu
Subject: Re: GREETINGS/reply
PHIL: G'DAY We have had Michael here 5 times for
courses. We
love the guy. He was hired by a consultant to "sell" a
roundabout to
our local commission and he "failed" not that he didn't
give it his
"all" and do a great job -- he did -- it is just that we
have some
really stupid commissioners and people that think we are
trying to
force the Arc De Triomphe on them. You would not believe
some of
the comments people make in "Lettters to the Editor"
sections of
our newspapers. In one City a retired cop formed a group
CARS
"Citizens Against Roundabouts". They had billboards and
Yard
Signs all over town. It is both funny and sad. I will
look forward to
receiving pictures. Check out our website when you get a chance.
Critique would be most welcome. It is a "work in
progress" but we
are getting it so we think it is pretty good.
(http://www.ksu.edu/roundabouts) G'DAY tell me is G'DAY both
a beginning and ending greeting ??? Good to hear from
you.
GENE
P.S. Our email limit is 2M, so people can usually send only two
or three at a time.
From: "Tony Redington" treding@psd.state.vt.us
Organization: Vermont Dept of Public Service
To: RSLcrown@aol.com, geno@ce.ksu.edu,
rsoyring@ci.traverse-city.mi.us,
smallwadd@earthlink.net, Joe.Bared@fhwa.dot.gov,
pgaldes@fveng.com,
RRetting@iihs.org, LRODEGERDTS@kittelson.com,
wallwork@mediaone.net,
gluttrell@netscape.net, michael.p.ronkin@odot.state.or.us,
Doctors@pbworld.com, g-jacquemart@peapc.com,
treding@psd.state.vt.us,
MNiederhauser@sha.state.md.us, ourston@west.net,
bigrusskie@yahoo.com,
dale_mckeel@yahoo.com, "Edmund Waddell" waddelle@mdot.state.mi.us
Date sent: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:32:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Upcoming issue of IIHS Status Report
Priority: normal
To Richard et al:
There is no specific information to report other
than the
expected spring 2001 construction in Hopauge (sp?), LI of a
roundabout in the downtown area, the first Mass. Highway Dept.
built roundabout at Duxbury, Mass. that was to go into
construction
last fall, and a note last month that a design firm
headed by Bill
Baranowski is working on about nine roundabouts in Utah
and New
York State.
My sense is that about a roundabout a day is
coming on line
somewhere in the US. It really is not possible at this
point, unless a
detailed survey is made, to put an exact number of roundabouts
built and a likely rate, other than to say that we, like
France, will in a
year or so be adding a thousand a year. I had calls this week
regarding a potential roundabout in Bellvue, Washington and the
North Shore in Massachusetts--both were cases where the
roundabout because one of its advantages over a traffic signal
(capacity in one case and service/traffic calming in the
other) is
being pursued. Roundabouts--as Michael Wallwork points
out--are
built to solve a problem. We are working on one in Vermont,
suddenly, after a lady who had just bought a car at a
dealership on
the corner of a high speed intersection was killed entering the
intersection. The auto dealer started a petition (over
200 names)
because another buyer totaled their new vehicle (minor injuries)
earlier this year! It is a junction of two NHS roads, a
signal is not
"warranted," and the state transportation agency ignored
a request
of the community to scope a roundabout at this location
two years
ago! Looks like there will be a scoping now (road is
four lane, 55
mph, with traffic lights about a half mile away).
Even the Keene, N.H., Bypass Expansion fight (Ourston,
Crown, Garder and myself have all at one time or another been a
part of this one, all on behalf of the Citizens group)
has a resistant
NHDOT ready to build one roundabout as a sop to opponents of
the bypass expansion. (Wallwork did an earlier
roundabout study
for the City also.) The City is just 20 miles from the
first two-lane
northeastern roundabout at Brattleboro.
Tony
On 28 Jun 2001, at 11:33, Edmund Waddell wrote:
Hi Richard: It's good to hear from you.
I can tell you what is happening in Michigan. Check
with Tony Redington in
VT and Mike Niederhauser in Maryland.
Local jurisdictions in Michigan have built 7 rdbts so
far, but 3 of them are
home made designs that barely qualify, other than that
they have yield signs. MDOT has arranged
quite a lot of training, but we have been "proceeding
with caution" and have not built one yet. We
have gradually built more staff confidence and internal
capability, so we now have several serious
proposals and it is only a matter of time. Barry Crown's
Chief Okemos Roundabout in Ingham County
still has a perfect safety record after a year of
operation (the previous signal had 5 crashes peryear). Leif
Ourston's MSU rdbt has been operating almost as long with
35,000 ADT and
6-7,000 peds, and has had only one side swipe collision
at last report. MDOT staff can observe those
rdbts at their leisure.
On May 30, 2001, the Village of Dimondale, Michigan
opened North America's
first Mini-roundabout, at a 3-leg intersection in a 25
mph zone. It comes complete with 21-meter
ICD, 5-meter entries,~1500 DHV, traversable 4-meter dome,
circular pavement arrows, improvedlighting, and British-style
bollards on the splitter islands - very chic. The TOTAL
project cost was
$35,000 (I know that's an awful lot of money, but it also
included resurfacing). They are still doing
some post-project evaluation and engineering, but we
definitely have a winner here, and the
village
is already contemplating another one.
We have eleven high-capacity (3,500 - 6,500 DHV)
roundabouts planned for the
Northwestern project, which will probably be built in
2006 or so, plus an unknown number of local
proposals and plans - I estimate perhaps as many as
thirty - some of which will probably be built
sooner. Acceptance continues to improve rapidly, so I
anticipate we will continue to see an
exponential increase in their acceptance/use in Michigan.
Folks can now observe the advantages and
opposition is quickly fading.
The biggest problem I see now is that many of the
folks planning, designing,
engineering, building, and painting them have never seen
a roundabout in their lives, or at best
have never before performed their professional role on a
rdbt project. Consequently they are
getting things wrong that could easily be avoided with
some training and direct supervision. In your
article, you should emphasize that there is much more to
a good rdbt design than it seems at first,
and that folks should get experienced advice and heed
it.
Ed
>>> Richard Retting RRetting@iihs.org 06/25/01 11:39AM >>>
In the Institute's next issue of Status Report, we'd like
to briefly report on
the extent of roundabout construction across the U.S.,
giving credit to those states that have been
very active in promoting roundabouts.
We'd appreciate your insights on the following
questions:
Approximately how many modern roundabouts ahave been
built so far in
the US, and approximately how many are in the planning
stages?
What specific states have been most active in building
modern roundabouts? How
many roundabouts would you estimate have been built in
each of these states?
Are there states with a lot of active interest in
building roundabouts,
although few have been built ("up-and-coming" roundabout
states?)
Thanks for your help.
Richard Retting
Senior Transportation Engineer
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
1005 N. Glebe Road
Arlington, VA 22201
703 247-1582 (voice)
703 247-1587 (fax)
Tony Redington
Vt. Dept. of Public Service
112 State St.
Montpelier, Vermont 05620
Tel. 802-828-4039
FX 802-828-2342
Per Garder
To: "'Michael wallwork'"
Copies to:geno@ksu.edu
Subject: RE: FW: Roundabout Research
Date sent: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:02:15 -0400
Michael,
I did not know that you were 'part' of this discussion.
I just sent Gene
some more comments and will paste them here. Maybe you
yourself can
comment on why Australian injury crash rates are so much
higher than Scandinavian
ones. Or maybe Leif has misquoted Australian data.
-Per
From: Gene Russell [mailto:geno@ce.ksu.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Per Garder
Subject: RE: FW: Roundabout Research
Per: Sorry if it bothered you that i forwarded your
comments to a
couple friends. I enjoy discussing things with Michael.
I don't
make anything "public,"like on our website, without
permission,
although we all have to realize that the "web" by nature
is pretty
public. I would like to set up a discussion section on
our web site
as suggested some time ago by Michael, and probably will
in a few
weeks. You bring up some excellent points. However i am,
and will
always remain, against using roundabouts strictly for
speed control
on arterials. As a bye product, fine, but not for speed
control being
the only reason. To get extreme, we could reduce deaths
on our
highways from around 42, 500 deaths/year to probably less
than
5000 if we had a strictly enforced , national speed limit
of 15 mph.
You think you could sell that to the USA public? My
point is that
our highways are primarily for mobility and that is as it
should be. I
am not against 15 mph for neighborhood roundabouts , and
22 to
25 (max) for collector and arterial roads, (as Michael
says, it
depends upon the environment ) but 15 mph everywhere just
will
not sell in most of the US. You want answers to
Australia's
situation, try Phil Jordan at vic roads. I will send you
his email if I
can find it. . If
you could
get any pictures from Sweden for our web site I would
appreciate it.
Do you have any contacts there ? best regards, gene
From: Per Garder
To: "'geno@ksu.edu'"
Subject: RE: FW: Roundabout Research
Date sent: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 13:37:04 -0400
Gene,
I was not offended that you shared my thoughts with
Michael. Just a bit
surprised. But, the right-to-know-act in Maine means
that anything I write
is public, I think, since I work for a State
university.
In the enclosed e-mail attachment is a document which
hopefully will not be
lost in the transfer. It is a virus-free report in
English with several
photos from Sweden, and empirical data showing that
roundabouts are safer
than diamond interchanges along two-lane highways with
high on and off
volumes at that spot.
And, I like driving fast myself. I seldom go below 75
mph on the Interstate
here in Maine and like cruising at 100 - 110 mph like
most Europeans, where
that is legal, so I am not someone who do not understand
that people like to
drive fast. Only in the US do I find that people accept
low speed limits
(and keep them) and high-speed design. I know that I
should be driving
slower myself, and that is why I appreciate designs that
force me and others
to do it. (I am not completely irresponsible, in 30 years
of driving I have
been involved in one accident, when I was hit from
behind, and I have not
had a speeding ticket or any other type of ticket in over
20 years.)
I believe that arterials should be built for high-speed
movement, and go
around towns. But if an arterial goes through someone's
shopping mall, then
those people's needs should be accommodated too. Until a
bypass is built
that may mean speeds of less than 20 mph. In Sweden,
that will be the
standard speed limit soon wherever pedestrians are
crossing. For rural
roundabouts, 25 mph is fine. But, the difference in delay
between 15 and 25
mph is only a few seconds. And like Michael wrote,
capacity increases with
lower speeds, at least down to 20 mph. Signalizing an
intersection gives
more delay (unless the minor flow is very low) than a
roundabout with a 15
mph speed.
You are right that a 15 mph speed limit everywhere would
make it even safer.
But the delay, like you tell me, would be unacceptable to
us all. However,
I do not believe that 'we' will find 15 mph urban
roundabouts unacceptable
in the long run. (And, since a high percentage of crashes
occur at
junctions, that is where we should make things safer in
particular.) Though
you have an example of one having been reconstructed to
higher speed at
least partially for that reason. If it was in a rural
setting, I
understand. If it was in a busy village environment, I
think DOT should not
have given in to the pressure.
-Per
From: Gene Russell [mailto:geno@ce.ksu.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Per Garder
Cc: Michael Wallwork; Greg Luttrell; Phil.Demosthenes@dot.state.co.us;Joe.barad@fhwa.dot.gov; WALSHB@WSDOT.WA.GOV
Subject: Re: FW: Roundabout Research
Per Garder: I only have time for a few comments. First,
thank you
very much for your comments and critique of our web site. I will
post your comments if you wish. i want to set up something so
people can post comments on anything on the site
directly, but we
are not there yet. I tend to personally not agree with
your
comments. First, however, let me say i am philosophically
against
unreasonably low speed limits anywhere and i consider 15 mph
generally too low anywhere. however, i have no problem with a 15
mph design for a roundabout in residential neighborhoods on
residential streets. for arterials and most collectors i
believe it is
too low and the design should be in the 20 to 25mph (max)
range.There was one designed on an arterial here for 15mph (or
lower) and it was a Public relations disaster. The city
had to close
it down and redesign the entry radii to a more reasonable
22 to 23
mph - and then the outcry settled down. And although it
still is not
perfect, it works. The problem (and this is the number
one problem
down the freeway there is the potential a driver will
come across
the median and hit us head on. Likely? No, thank goodness, but
the potential exists. the old roundabouts I refer to have higher
speeds. Higher speeds mean more serious crashes. that is simply
a law of Physics. To not believe that, is to not believe
in the laws of
Physics. Again, thank you for the comments and I look forward to
more of your ideas.
gene russell
From: David Church [mailto:Church@ksdot.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 3:16 PM
To: garder@maine.edu
Cc: geno@ksu.edu
Subject: Roundabout Research
Dr. Garder,
It was very nice visiting with you today regarding
roundabouts and
traffic calming in Kansas. It was nice to hear what your
involvement has been
with roundabouts, and pedestrian safety in Maine, as well
as in other parts
of the world. As I stated, if you would like to find out
more about what
research is being done in Kansas, I would contact Dr.
Gene Russell at
Kansas State University in Manhattan. Below is Dr.
Russell's e-mail address:
geno@ksu.edu
Also, for your information is a copy of the KSU
Roundabout web-page. It
may be of some interest to you as well.
http://www.ksu.edu/roundabouts/
If you have any other questions about what Kansas is
doing with regard
to roundabouts, please don't hesitate to call me at (785)
296-3618.
David Church
Senior Traffic Engineer
KDOT, Bureau of Traffic Engineering
From: Michael wallwork [mailto:mwallwork@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 1:02 PM
To: geno@ksu.edu; Per Garder
Cc: Michael Wallwork; Greg Luttrell; Phil.Demosthenes@dot.state.co.us;
Joe.barad@fhwa.dot.gov; WALSHB@WSDOT.WA.GOV
Subject: Re: FW: Roundabout Research
I am not sure if my previous set of comments actually
went. So I am
sending them again.
I have always designed rbts to suit the environment, 15
mph in residential
street, up to 23 mph for arterial roads. In Australia
they alsyws do the
same.
To do otherwise can lead to disenchantment or too high a
speed for the
envoironment. This is not the first one that was designed
too small. Design
speeds over 25 mph will lead to much higher crash rates
and reduced
capacity as speeds increase and drivers need larger gaps
to enter, less capacity,
higher speeds mean less time to avoid problems.
From: MacDonald, Doug
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:42 PM
To: WSDOT ER All Users; WSDOT NC All Users; WSDOT NW All Users; WSDOT OR
All; WSDOT OSC All Staff; WSDOT SC All Users; WSDOT SW All Users; WSDOT
WSF All Staff
Subject: Familiar Face Returns to WSDOT
I am very pleased to announce the appointment and return
of John Conrad
to the Washington State Department of Transportation.
John has accepted my
offer to serve in the newly created position of Assistant
Secretary,
Engineering and Regional Operations.
John returns to the Department after working with the
private firm of
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas Inc., where he
worked in program
management for the British Highways Agency on the
motorway and trunk
road system in the United Kingdom.
Before his working as a private consultant, John served
at WSDOT for 23
years in multi-modal planning, local programs, traffic
operations, and
maintenance. He has been tireless in his work to provide
a safe
environment for employees in construction work zones. He
last served as
Assistant Secretary of Field Operations Support. We are
pleased to have
John rejoin the management team and demonstrate his
ongoing commitment
to the success of the agency.
John received a bachelor's degree in civil engineering
from the
University of Nebraska, and a master's degree in regional
and community planning
from Kansas State University. John is a licensed
professional engineer.
John will begin his new duties on Friday, August 3.
Please join me in
welcoming him home.
|