Abstract

Copyright Notice
This abstract is provided for traditional scholarship communications and for the personal use of colleagues. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders. These works may not be posted or re-posted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Brase (2002, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making)
Research suggesting both a superiority of frequencies over single-event probabilities and of smaller reference classes over very large reference classes have utilized tasks that vary in computational complexity. The present research sought to simply and directly evaluate if--apart from simplifying statistical inference tasks--frequencies and small reference classes are clearer than other formats. 320 undergraduates participated in this research. After eliminating possible computational confounds, simple frequencies (based on small reference classes, e.g. 1/3) and to some extent relative frequencies (percentages, e.g. 33%) were perceived as clearer than absolute frequencies (based on very large reference classes, e.g. 90 million Americans) and single-event probabilities (e.g. 0.33). Concurrently, these different formats were evaluated in terms of their relative influence. Absolute frequencies were relatively more persuasive for smaller magnitudes (e.g. 2.7 million) but less persuasive for larger magnitudes (e.g. 267 million), as compared to analogous presentations. Single-event probabilities were judged to minimize the significance of information.