Abstract
Brase (2001, Thinking & Reasoning)
Reasoning
about social groups and their associated markers was investigated as a
particular case of human reasoning about cue-category relationships, using
college students as Ss. Assertions that reasoning involving cues (group
markers) and associated categories (social groups) elicits specific
probabilistic assumptions are supported by the results of three experiments.
This phenomenon remains intact across the use of categorical syllogisms
(Experiment 1), conditional syllogisms (Experiment 2), and the use of social
groups that vary in their perceived cohesiveness, or entitativity (Experiment
3). Implications are discussed for various theories of reasoning, and
additional aspects of social group/coalitional reasoning are also discussed.