Abstract

Copyright Notice
This abstract is provided for traditional scholarship communications and for the personal use of colleagues. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders. These works may not be posted or re-posted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Brase, Cosmides, & Tooby (1998, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General)
Evolutionary approaches to judgment under uncertainty have led to new data showing that untutored subject reliably produce judgments that conform to may principles of probability theory when (a) they are asked to compute a frequency instead of the probability of a single event, and (b) the relevant information is expressed as frequencies. But are the frequency-computation systems implicated in these experiments better at operating over some kinds of input than others? Principles of object perception and principles of adaptive design led us to propose the individuation hypothesis: that these systems are designed to produce well-calibrated statistical inferences when they operate over representations of “whole” objects, events, and locations. In a series of experiments on Bayesian reasoning, we show that human performance can be systematically improved or degraded by varying whether a correct solution requires one to compute hit and false-alarm rates over “natural” units, such as whole objects, as opposed to inseparable aspects, views, and other parsings that violate evolved principles of object construal.