Are Private Rooms the Future of
the Long-Term Care Industry?
Summary Calkins, M. & Cassella, C.(2007). Exploring the cost and
value of private versus shared bedrooms in nursing homes. The Gerontologist,
47 (2), 169-183.
Since the beginning of the long-term care industry, there has been a
desire to constantly improve residents’ quality of care and life.
One of the ways to achieve these goals could be by assuring a private
room to each resident. A new model of care, person-centered care, focuses
on a resident’s autonomy, dignity and privacy. With that in mind,
a private room appears to best accommodate most residents’ individualized
needs, personalities and routines. Presently,
three types of rooms are available in most nursing homes:
--- (traditional) a shared room, frequently called a semi-private room,
where
residents’ private territories are usually separated by a curtain
--- an enhanced shared room, where residents’ territories are
well defined within the room (for example, by a wall) or where each
resident has a private room and only a bathroom is shared between two
persons
--- a private room, where a resident does not share a bedroom and a
bathroom with others
There is strong evidence that the majority of older adults prefer a
private room. The reasons for wanting to live in a private room are
identified as follows:
--- privacy for oneself and when visiting with others (including the-end-of
life phase for a dying resident and his/her family)
--- better sleep (uninterrupted by taking care of a roommate’s
needs)
--- having control over one’s lifestyle and environment, like
deciding when to watch TV, what TV programs/shows to choose, following
one’s daily schedules and routines, controlling room temperature,
etc.
--- not having to feel uncomfortable while watching a roommate (“unwilling
observer”)
Research suggests that residents who live in private rooms are less
susceptible to acquired infections. Analysis of private versus shared
rooms from the perspective of providers has shown that it takes more
time to market shared rooms and more staff time to resolve conflicts
between roommates, especially when a solution requires transferring
a resident to another room. Estimates of the average time spent on roommate
issues could range from 2 to 25 hours per week. Extra staff time spent
in finding the best solutions for roommate problems is not the only
issue. Additional cost is accrued due to the need for extra room cleaning
and maintenance. A big concern in person-centered care is that residents
are given little choice when they must change rooms due to a conflict.
An effective adjustment to a new living situation requires staff members’
investment of extra time in getting to know a new resident, his/her
clinical needs and daily routines.
Even
though many benefits of a private room are self evident, the greatest
barrier in the long-term care industry in considering its wide implementation
is cost. Hence, researchers analyzed costs related to the three room
configurations. The cost of room construction was based on detailed
dimensions of its wall length and consideration of elements like windows,
a closet, a bathroom, fixtures, etc. Standard commercial-grade-construction
assumptions, like 2X4 framing, vinyl flooring and 20- year shingles
for the Cleveland, Ohio area was another part of the cost estimates.
Traditional
room |
Enhanced
shared room |
Private
room |
$8,252 per person |
$10,301
per person |
$14,906
per person |
Typically, a resident will pay an average of $167 for a shared room
and $190 for a private room, a difference of $23. The difference in
costs (including debt) to construct a private room in comparison to
a shared room (both types) can be recouped in 596 days. This calculation
assumes that a shared room is fully occupied. However, if one bed is
empty in a shared room, the time to recoup the cost of constructing
a private room goes down to 82 days. In other words, the lost revenue
for every 82 resident days below full census is equal to a cost of building
a private room. This calculation is based on private fees, as Medicaid
does not pay for a private room. The cost of analysis changes for the
home whose residents are on Medicaid.
Implications: Knowledge about construction costs could
be a starting point for discussions related to a deeper dissemination
of the principles of person-centered care. Living in a private
room accommodates residents’ preferences and personalities more
easily than sharing a living space with another person.