Kansas State University
205 Leasure Hall
Manhattan, KS 66506-3501
Phone: (785)532-6070
Fax: (785)532-7159
kscfwru@ksu.edu

Homepage

About the Unit
Cooperators
Mission Statement
History
Unit News
Courses
Publications

Facilities

People
Faculty and Staff
Graduate Students

Research
Current Projects
Completed Projects
Technical Assistance
Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)

Resources and Employment
Graduate School
Graduate Applications

Forms and Manuals
Assistantships and Positions
Careers

Effects of experimental manipulation of coterie size on demography of Black-tailed prairie dogs in South Dakota

Investigators
Lorri A. Newby, M.S. Student
Dr. Jack Cully

Project Supervisor
Dr. Jack Cully


Funding
EPA, USGS, KDWP, U.S. Forest Service
Cooperators
Sharon Collinge, Chris Ray, and David Augustine
Location
Western Great Plains
Completion:
2007

Objectives

Test whether increasing or decreasing numbers affects growth, survival, reproduction, and dispersal of prairie dog coterie size.

Progress and Results

Life-history traits can be affected by density, especially in species restricted in range. Black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) are restricted to an area occupied by three or four related females, one breeding male, and their offspring, which live within social groups called coteries. To test whether increasing or decreasing numbers affected growth, survival, reproduction, and dispersal, the number of juveniles in24 coteries within four colonies in Badlands and Wind Cave National Parks were manipulated by adding or removing juveniles or left as controls during the springs of 2002 and 2003. Growth was assessed by measuring the mass of juveniles and yearlings throughout subsequent summers. Daily mass gain for 346 juveniles did not differ significantly among treatments (increased: 4.18 g/day (S.D. = 1.47, n = 161); decreased: 4.23 g/day (S.D. = 1.34, n = 58); control: 4.21 g/day (S.D. = 1.49, n = 127)). Similarly, daily mass gain for 39 yearlings was not significantly different among treatments (increased: 1.08 g/day (S.D. = 1.12, n = 12); decreased: 1.46 g/day (S.D. = 1.42, n = 8); control: 1.205 g/day (S.D. = 1.51, n = 19)). Likewise the number of juveniles that survived into their next year was not significantly different among treatments (increased: 32% (n = 108); decreased: 36% (n = 53); control: 34% (n = 145)). Also, there were no significant differences among treatments in the number of adults or yearlings that were lactating the following year (adults - increased: 62% (n = 13), decreased: 68% (n = 19), control: 73% 9n = 15); yearlings - increased: 44% (n = 9), decreased: 30% (n = 10), control: 20% (n = 15)). Dispersal of yearling males was not affected by manipulation. Though high variance in coterie densities yielded no statistically significant effects, juvenile and yearling growth, and yearling survival exhibited expected trends with growth and survival being lower in increased coteries and higher in decreased coteries. Density differences due to these manipulations may not have been pronounced enough to have significant effects on these demographic parameters. Future studies should increase differences among treatments to determine if these demographic parameters are density-dependent.

Products:

Thesis or Dissertation:
Newby, L.A. 2005. (Advisor: Cully). Effects of Experimental Manipulation of Coterie Size on Demography of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs in South Dakota. M.S. Thesis. Division of Biology, KSU. Manhattan.

Presentations:
Newby, L. A., and J. F. Cully, Jr. 2003. Effects of litter size on growth in juvenile black-tailed prairie dogs. American Society of Mammalogists Annual Meeting, Lubbock, TX.

Newby, L. A., and J. F. Cully, Jr. 2003. Effects of litter size on growth in black-tailed prarie dogs. Paper presented at the Kansas Chapter of The Wildlife Society meeting, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

Newby, L. A., and J. F. Cully, Jr. 2003. Effects of litter size on growth in black-tailed prarie dogs. Kansas State University, Division of Biology, 29th Annual Graduate Student Research Forum, Manhattan, KS.