Biology
890: Advanced Fisheries Science
Fall
2006
Instructor
Dr.
Craig Paukert
204B
Leasure Hall
532-6522
e-mail:
cpaukert@ksu.edu
web
page: www.ksu.edu/fisheries/
Office
hours: By appointment
Meeting
times
TBD
Friday
Class
webpage: www.ksu.edu/fisheries/classes/advfishsci/advfishsci.htm
Note: all assignments, data sets, etc. will be posted on K-State online. use K-State online as your primary source of information for the class.
Objectives
This
course will provide and overview of current topics as well as analytical
techniques used to assess fish populations in a variety of systems.
The objectives of this course are
to give students knowledge of concepts, tools, and techniques that they can use
in future research and management of fish populations.
The
course will have a strong independent research component in which the students
will use existing data sets (or data they collect) and apply the concepts from
this class. I would like to you use
some of the tools, concepts, and/or techniques from the class and apply them to
your data to answer a question. There
is a lot of flexibility in this research project as I want you to get something
out of this that can possibly be published or be part of your thesis or
dissertation.
Some
examples of possible projects:
1.
Using bioenergetics models to determine consumption of prey by a predatory fish
2.
Determine the effects of certain harvest restriction (e.g., minimum length
limit) on a fish population
3.
Using GIS to determine stream habitat loss due to impoundments
4.
Evaluate differences in abundance, size structure, etc. from several gears
5.
Determine the effects of nonrandom sampling on population statistics
6.
Determine the effects of tagging on growth and condition of fish
These
are just examples and each student should come up with their own project.
We have the use of an experimental stream in the basement of Leasure Hall
for a project. If you do not have
data of your own, feel free to talk me as I have several data sets that could be
used in the class. In addition, I
would also consider the student conducting a review paper in lieu of a research
project. The project can be on most
anything that would involve you learning a new technique or concept.
All projects will need to be approved by me before they can be done.
Group
field project:
In
addition to the independent project, we will also conduct a field project on the
Format:
The
format of the class will be meeting one day per week for two class hours and for
about one hour each Friday for a discussion (see Paper discussions and
participation below). The 2-hour
class will be a combination of lecture, discussion, and (in some cases)
workshops. I hope that the course
will have an informal atmosphere where students will be comfortable interjecting
their thoughts throughout the 2-hour period.
We will be using several computer packages (e.g., Wisconsin Bioenergetics
3.0; Fishery Analyses and Simulation Tools) that will require some class time to
be used as workshops for these packages.
Academic
misconduct
Visit the KSU Honor System Web Page for
details: http://www.ksu.edu/honor
Grading
(350 total points)
Presentation
(50 points) –
Each student will give a presentation on their research project near the end of
the semester. The structure should
be similar to a professional meeting presentation, with 15 minutes for the
presentation, with 5 minutes for questions.
Class
calculations and assignments (50 points)
– Each student will be expected to analyze three data sets given in class.
These short exercises will allow the student to become familiar with some of the
techniques (e.g., calculation of recruitment variability, mortality estimates,
etc.) discussed in class. We will go
over each of the assignments in class so the real key is that each student try
the calculations and turn them in on time.
Group
field project (50 points)
– Each student ill be expected to contribute in the field and lab in the group
project on the
Written
report or manuscript (100 points)
– Each student will write a manuscript on the data analysis and research
project they selected for the class. This
should build on the proposal you wrote earlier in the semester, but should
include an introduction, methods, results, and discussion.
The manuscripts should follow the format of Transactions of the
American Fisheries Society or other journal where the paper could be submitted
for publication. I encourage
submission of this manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal.
Paper
discussions and participation (50 points) -
We will have weekly discussion either in class or during our typical Friday
afternoon Aquatic Ecology Journal Club meeting. Each of you will be expected to
lead two of the paper discussions. One
paper will be from the syllabus and the other will be of your choosing.
Remember that they key to leading a discussion is instigating discussion
from other group members, not just provide a summary of the paper.
Schedule (subject to change)
|
Week |
Week
of: |
Lecture
Topic |
Discussion
Paper |
|
1 |
Aug.
21 |
Overview,
sampling design |
|
|
2 |
Aug.
28 |
Sampling
design; discuss project proposals |
|
|
3 |
Sep.
4 (Mon Holiday) |
Gear
bias |
Johnson
1999 |
|
4 |
Sep.
11 |
Lake
Placid AFS meeting-no class |
|
|
5 |
Sep.
18 |
Sampling
size and power; proposals due |
Peterman
1990 |
|
6 |
Sep.
25 |
field
work |
|
|
7 |
Oct.
2 (Mon. Holiday) |
Mortality |
Naiman
and Latterell 2005 |
|
8 |
Oct.
9 |
Recruitment |
|
|
9 |
Oct.
16 |
Tagging
and marking |
|
|
10 |
Oct.
23 |
Bioenegetics
|
Petersen
and Kitchell 2001 |
|
11 |
Oct.
30 |
Bioenegetics
|
|
|
12 |
Nov.
6 |
Harvest
regulations |
Churchill
et al. 2002 |
|
13 |
Nov.
13 |
Adaptive
management |
|
|
14 |
Nov.
20 (Thurs-Fri |
no
class |
|
|
15 |
Nov.
27 |
Presentations;
final papers due |
|
|
16 |
Dec.
4 |
|
|
Required
Text
None.
Readings
Journal
club papers:
Churchill,
T. N., P. W. Bettoli, D. C. Petersen, W. C. Reeves, and B. Hodge.
2002. Angler conflicts in
fisheries management: a case study of the striped bass controversy at Norris
Reservoir,
Johnson,
D. 1999. The insignificance of
statistical significance testing. Journal
of Wildlife Management 63(3): 763-772.
Naiman,
R. J., and J. J. Latterell. 2005.
Principles for linking fish habitat to fisheries management and
conservation. Journal of Fish
Biology 67:166-185.
Peterman.
R. 1990.
Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:2-15.
Petersen,
J. H., and J. F. Kitchell. 2001.
Climate regimes and water temperature changes in the
Other
recommended readings
Irwin,
E. R., and M. C. Freeman. 2002
Proposal for adaptive management to conserve biotic integrity in a regulated
segment of the Talapoosa River, Alabama, USA.
Conservation Biology 16(5):1212-1222.
Diana,
J. S. 2004. Biology and ecology of
fishes, second edition. Cooper
Publishing,
Fisher,
W. L., and F. J. Rahel. 2004.
Geographic information systems in fisheries.
American Fisheries Society,
Hanson,
P. C., T. B. Johnson, D.
Krebs,
C. J. 1999. Ecological methodology,
second edition. Benjamin Cummings,
Quinn,
T. J. and R. B. Deriso. 1999.
Quantitative fish dynamics.
Slipke,
J. W., and M. J. Maceina. 2001.
Fishery Analyses and simulation tools manual, version 2.0.
Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures,
Thompson,
S. K.2002. Sampling, second edition.
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Walters,
C. J. 2003.
Folly and fantasy in the analysis of spatial catch rate data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:1433-1436.
Walters,
C. J. 2001.
Adaptive management of renewable resources.