|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Sightlines profile
- 95% retention rate on over 260 campuses, 23,500 buildings and 825M GSF
|
|
3
|
- A vocabulary for measurement
- The Return on Physical Assets – ROPASM
|
|
4
|
- Core issue #1: Impact of an older age profile
- 90% of campus is over 25 years of age (Analysis is on state funded
facilities)
|
|
5
|
- Kansas State University space profile
- 72 state funded buildings – 4,592,483 GSF: Academic/Admin space only
|
|
6
|
- Kansas State University space profile
- 72 state funded buildings – 4,592,483 GSF: Academic/Admin space only
|
|
7
|
- Impact of tech rating and density factor
- Older campus results in lower tech rating, but heavily used space
|
|
8
|
- Growth in space vs. student population
- Peers are growing in space and enrollment faster than Kansas State
|
|
9
|
- Core issue #2: Investing less than peers
- KSU is annually spending $3.16/GSF less than peers
|
|
10
|
- Total capital spending vs. peers
- Kansas State is spending more money on systems and envelope than peers
|
|
11
|
- Campus age profile impacts capital requirements
- Older campus has more needs
|
|
12
|
- Stewardship investment target
- Defining attainable goals to manage the rate of deferral
|
|
13
|
- Stewardship target increases annually
- Budgeted stewardship includes planned maintenance from budget and
R&R funds
|
|
14
|
- Budgeted annual stewardship vs. peers
- Historically stewarding more than peers
|
|
15
|
- Budget total capital investment over time
- Shortfall with capital investment increases the backlog of need
|
|
16
|
- Estimating the value of the backlog of need
|
|
17
|
- Total backlog compared to peers
- Backlog estimate provided may be understated
|
|
18
|
- Core issue #3: Competing with peer using less
- KSU on average is operating at $0.81/GSF less than peers
|
|
19
|
- Facilities operating budget
- Higher utilities cost due to the above average consumption levels
|
|
20
|
- Campus condition significantly impacts consumption
- Alarming trend of energy consumption levels since FY2006
|
|
21
|
- Age and backlog impact maintenance staff
- Limited capital significantly impacts maintenance metrics
|
|
22
|
- Custodial performance
- Covering more space than the peer average and buildings look cleaner
|
|
23
|
- Grounds performance
- Grounds inspection scores above peer institutions
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
Notes