Dramatic irony in Oedipus the King

Here are a few of the places where the audience’s prior knowledge of the full story enables dramatic irony.  A character -- in this case Oedipus or Jocasta -- makes a remark that he or she understands to apply to the facts in a particular manner, but the audience understands that it applies as well, or instead, to facts the character is ignorant of, and that, when eventually brought to light for them, will radically change their circumstances. 

Of course, dramatic irony as such is not necessarily tragic.  In comedy, for example, the change in circumstances dramatic irony portends can be for the better.  But some of the most famous and powerful uses of dramatic irony are associated with tragedy, where it serves to emphasize how limited human understanding can be even when it is most plausible, and how painful can be the costs of the misunderstandings, in some sense inevitable, that result. 

Here, too, though, a caution is in order.  We will miss much if we insist on seeing only this general fact.  The particular "flavor" and thematic resonance of individual instances of dramatic irony in a given tragedy will depend on the particular circumstances of that individual work.  The questions at the end of this memo are designed to prompt us to take stock of the what may be special about what Sophocles wants to use dramatic irony to emphasize in this particular work.  We should remain open to the possibility that even the same playwright, in another work (for example, Sophocles in his Antigonź), might undertake to use the same general effect to quite different thematic ends.

There are additional instances of dramatic irony in Oedipus the King.  Here we are singling out only a few of the most prominent and a couple of more subtle ones.

References below are to two distinct translations of the play.  Consult the ones that correspond to the edition you are using.


The Fagles translation

<Numbers between angle brackets refer to the translation by Robert Fagles in the Penguin Classics edition of Sophocles, The Three Theban Plays:  Antigone, Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus.  Dramatic irony is confined to the prologue and first 3 episodes or stasimons, because it is Episode  IV that Oedipus learns the full truth about his situation, and in the Exodos he expresses the various aspects of the misery into which this discovery plunges him.]>

<167>
towards the end of the Prologue:  lines 150-160:  Oedipus' resolution to Creon.
 
<171-172>
Episode I, lines 248-261, 266-286:  Oedipus' exhortation to the citizens of Thebes, and oath.
 
<174>
Episode I, lines 315-320:  Leader's question and Oedipus' reply
 
<190>
Episode II, lines 616-617:  Oedipus' reproach of Creon.
 
<201>
Episode II, lines 778-800:  Jocasta intervenes to calm Oedipus' consternation over Tiresias' prophecy.  (What's her conclusion about Tiresias' prophecy?  What general principle does she derive this from?  What does she cite as a case in point that establishes this principle?)
 
<201>
Episode II, lines 794-796:  in the immediate context of lines 778-800 — Oedipus' response to Jocasta's narrative.
 
<206>
Episode II, lines 899-901:  in the immediate context of ll. 778-800 — Oedipus on the possibility that he killed Laius. (Remember:  the question of whether Laius is his father is a distinct one, and hasn’t yet occurred to Oedipus).
 
<224>
Episode III, lines 1188-1190, 1204-1214:  in the immediate context of ll. 1036-1040 and 1069-1072 :  Oedipus’ rationale for dismissing Jocasta’s plea that he terminate the inquiry, and the Chorus' reaction to this.

The Fitts/Fitzgerald translation

[Numbers in brackets are the page references to our text, Kennedy and Gioia's Literature:  An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama, in the 7th Edition & the Shorter 2nd Edition, respectively.  Recall that the Fitts/Fitzgerald translation used there uses the term "scene" to refer to the segment of action (exchange between characters) that takes place before an Ode.  In this scheme, the action of Oedipus the King breaks into 4 scenes, each followed by an ode, and all together preceded by the Parodos, and followed by the Exodos.  Dramatic irony is confined to prologues and the first 3 scenes, because it is Scene IV that Oedipus learns the full truth about his situation, and in the Exodos he expresses the various aspects of the misery into which this discovery plunges him.]

[1261 / 967]
Scene I, lines 3-34, 41-56:  Oedipus’ exhortation to the citizens of Thebes, and oath.
 
[1262 / 968]
Scene I, lines. 60-65:   Choragos’ question and Oedipus’ reply.
[1269 / 975]
Scene II, lines. 38-40:  Oedipus’ reproach of Creon.
<201>
Scene II, lines 181-205:  Jocasta intervenes to calm Oedipus' consternation over Tiresias' prophecy.  (What's her conclusion about Tiresias' prophecy?  What general principle does she derive this from?  What does she cite as a case in point that establishes this principle?)
[1273 / 979]
Scene II, lines. 199-200, in the immediate context of ll. 181-205 — dialogue between Iocastź and Oedipus.
[1276 / 982]
Scene II, lines. 289-90, in the immediate context of ll. 181-205 — Oedipus on the possibility that he killed Laļos. (Remember:  the question of whether Laļos is his father is a distinct one, and hasn’t yet occurred to Oedipus).
[1282 / 988]
Scene III, lines. 147-48 and 160-61, in the immediate context of ll. 136-65:  Oedipus’ rationale for dismissing Jocasta’s plea that he terminate the inquiry, and the Chorus' reaction to this.

Some issues to explore in connection with the passages cited above.  The point here is to try to appreciate what might be the particular effects Sophocles seems to be concerned to use dramatic irony to evoke in this particular work, and what might be the thematic ends these in turn could be serving.  Something like these should occur to us whenever we recognize we are dealing with dramatic irony. 

(1) What reflections would these moments stimulate in the minds of the audience?

Each is of course a moment of intense dramatic irony.  But in what exactly, in each particular case, does this irony, for the audience, consist? 

How do these instances of dramatic irony depend on the protagonist’s hamartia in the sense of "missing the mark" (a misjudgment about the reference of a key term)?

(2) What feelings would these thoughts in turn tend to arouse?

(3) How do these thoughts and feelings relate in turn to the ideas expressed by Chorus and Leader/Choragos in

<Fagles 223-224> / [Fitts/Fitzgerald 1285-86 / 991-92] 
Ode IV — Consider the whole; then re-read the opening — <Fagles, lines 1311-1319> / [Fitts/Fitzgerald, lines 1-9] —  which applies not just to Oedipus but to mankind as a whole.
<Fagles 251:  lines 1678-1685> / [Fitts/Fitzgerald 1294 / 1000:  Exodos, lines 292-300]
The final lines of the play 

Remember, this is being spoken by either (in Fagles) by the Chorus to the itself or (in Fitts/Fitzgerald) by the Choragos to the Choros ("men of Thebes"), who within the scene of the play, have been spectators of the action concerning Oedipus and Jocasta.  At this point, the Chorus is in a position equivalent, in knowledge, to Sophocles' direct audience, the men of Athens in attendance at the Festival of Dionysus.  It is thus on the table to consider whether these lines articulate what some important part of what Sophocles wanted to prompt his countrymen to make of the spectacle they've just witnessed.  

By the accidents of history, it may be, they come to be addressed, ultimately, to us.

(4) On the basis of the ideas you've been led to in thinking through your answers to the above questions, how would you say the audience's repeated experiences of dramatic irony contribute to Sophocles' overall thematic purpose in the play?


  Return to the Index to Study Guides on Sophocles' Oedipus the King.

  Suggestions, comments and questions are welcome.  Please send them to lyman@ksu.edu .

      Contents copyright © 2002 by Lyman A. Baker

Permission is granted for non-commercial educational use; all other rights reserved.

      This page last updated 27 February 2003.