|
MENTAL
PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS!
The Problem: Athletes frequently encounter competitive
situations in which they under perform in skills in which they previously
have demonstrated competence. For
example, a basketball player is capable of shooting foul shots at an 85%
rate in practice and has an average of 75% or better in games. However, they suddenly get into game
situations in which they start shooting no better than 50% and are
described as “tight”. Similarly, a
baseball player may be known as a good hitter with an over .300 batting
average suddenly goes into a “slump” in which they cannot make solid
contact with the ball. A golfer
says they are confident of being able to make shots, yet their approach
during a swing seems to “lock up” at the crucial moment creating an errant
shot.
All of these performance activities are
attributed to a mental reaction, a thought process, which interferes with
the natural capability that the athlete can achieve. Coaches will often describe this as
freezing up, clutching, feeling the pressure, being tight, losing
confidence, etc. Opposing coaches
will actually try to produce the phenomenon by calling a time out before
crucial free throws by the other team or before the place kicker tries to
kick a game winning field goal. In
many ways coaches are more adept at creating the pressure in a player than
reducing the pressure or relieving the mental triggers.
There are coaches that
will simulate competitive environments during practice situations
(heightening the noise level in practice, using taunts, etc.) to prepare
the athletes for pressure situations, but few know what to do once a case
of “the nerves” has arrived.
Sometimes the attempt at solution may even confound the problem. Tactics such as requiring more practice
attempts, pulling the participant out of competition, and similar
strategies may reinforce the thinking that the athlete “has a problem” and
confound the mental message that is provoking the undesired response. Similarly, other coaches may try to
downplay any response to the athlete hoping to diminish the attention that
provokes more anxiety. Again, paradoxically, avoidance is also a form of
attention.
A coach who had gone through a game in which a couple of key
players were having a “shooting slump” was quoted as saying we “we don’t
need a sport psychologist--we just need to go out and do what we are
capable of doing”. It seemed
implied by the comment that the coach did not want to call undue mental
attention by asking for the service of a professional “sport shrink”, a psychologist
who works with mental processes because that might be a sign that the
problem is significant. The truth
is that for the most part, this area of performance difficulty seems rather
mystical or undefined to many and is viewed without an easy prescription or
solution. However, this is exactly
what a sport psychologist can offer to a coach—an understanding of the
dynamics of what happens when a player “down shifts” under competitive
pressure and specific methods that can be used to alleviate these
situations.
Understanding the Concept of a “Slump”, “shaken confidence” and
“under performance”. In
order to offer solutions to this area of athlete performance we must first
define and understand what is happening to them in terms of the mind body connection.
Principle 1: The mind,
mental thoughts and reactions, have direct influence on physical behavior
and actions.
Our most vivid demonstration of this
principle is when we attach physiological sensors called biofeedback (such
as muscle tension, heart rate, perspiration) to measure the immediate
changes that take place at even the verbal suggestion of an activity,
person, or situation. Providing
this mirror of very quick and exacting mind-body response heightens the
person’s awareness of how dramatic the link can be and how quickly it can
change.
Vice versa is also true, a physical body behavior can also affect
one’s thinking.
While we are most interested in the link of response pattern from
the mind to the physiological response, it is also true that the link is
reciprocal. Responses within the body return to and also affect a response
in the mind.
Principle 2: Nearly
everybody will experience a situation in which thinking creates a “hiccup”
that alters the physical response.
It is when the pattern continues and grows that the problem becomes
pronounced.
For example, everyone has been known to
sneeze because of a sudden irritation.
The reflex immediately permeates the body and alters the system for
that brief moment. The system then
gathers itself and goes back to a normal functioning state.
|
However, if the sneeze could become more continuous, we then
believe it is a symptom of a “virus” that starts to alter ones well being
over time. The sneeze is just an
incidental and accepted snafu, the virus demands more attention and
remediation. Very similar to this
analogy is the collective process that creates an athlete’s slump. One setback leads to “trying harder” to
compensate, which leads to a physical reaction making the next attempt more
difficult, as this spiral continues, we then look at the athlete as having
“lost confidence” and entering an on-going pattern of lowered performance.
Principle 3: There are
certain performance skills that are more likely to be negatively affected
by the mental incident. These areas
can be described as those activities that require “fine tuning” and
“focus”.
Fine-tuning is very similar to the adjustment on a television set,
which by being off a very slight turn can make the picture distort. The basic components needed for a
television picture may all be in place…color, signal of the picture, sound,
etc—however, with the fine-tuning off, a relatively small detail, the
picture still becomes unsatisfactory.
Other performance skill areas can be unaffected and some may even be
enhanced by the mental signal of “the pressure is on, I got to
perform”. These tend to be large
muscle activities, such as running, lifting, jumping. So while a person’s foul shooting
finesse goes down, they will see little if any deficit in their ability to
run the floor, jump for rebounds, or play defense.
Principle 4: Some athletes, sometimes referred to as “prime time”
competitors, may actually thrive and perform better in the clutch. When studying these athletes we can
determine that they maintain a high level of resilience and are able to
maintain a focus on the immediate situation.
(cONTINUED NEXT PAGE)
|
|
ATHLETES
WHO HAVE COMPLETED CHAMPS TRNG
Olympic Medalist: Professionals: International Stars:
Kenny Harrison Mark Simoneau Anna Pampoulsa
Mitch Richmond Darren Howard Korene Hinds
Ben Leber
Lisi Maurer
National Top 5: Darren Sproles Lysaira Romane
Christian Smith Damian McIntosh Big 12 All Stars
Amy Mortimer Tank Reese Pat Maloney
Terence Newman Rashad Washington James Rheame
****************************************
CONSULTATION QUESTIONS FROM COACHES
ABOUT THE MENTAL/PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT OF SPORTS
Fred B. Newton, Ph.D.
1.
How do you overcome mental blocks, slumps, or what is perceived as
under performance due to some sort of mental barrier?
2.
How can you get athletes to stay “focused”, “concentrate” on the
task, not make mistakes under game or performance pressures? How do you reduce the pre-performance
jitters?
3.
How do you develop “team chemistry”, teamwork, team communication,
or team investment in common goals?
4.
How do you assess and understand personality factors such as
athletes’ attitudes, motivation, learning and behavioral styles?
5.
How can self-defeating thoughts be overcome, or self-limiting
mental sets, such as what happens during a losing streak for a team?
6.
What should be done with injured players? How can they be helped to adjust mentally/emotionally, be
motivated to rehab and return, experience themselves as still important
part of a team?
7.
How can leadership be identified, developed, fostered, nourished
with a team? Can personal
qualities and attitudes be identified when recruiting an athlete? Can the
psychological factors have the same level of objectified measurement such
as the physical qualities that are commonly used (speed, strength, size,
skills)?
8.
How can a balance be made between the order and structure needs
(discipline, following rules, going with the plan) and the creativity
needs (ability to adapt, innovate, or make a decision during
performance) when the predictable circumstances demand an athlete make
decisions and create good choices for unique situations?
9.
How can you identify when a player has (mental, physical, social)
personal problems often separate from, but typically impacting, sport
performance? And what should be
done (by the coach or staff) to get the athlete assistance with these
problems?
Fred B. Newton, Ph.D.
|