|
|
Web Site Accessibility Committeereturn to committee web siteWeb Accessibility Committee Minutes In attendance: Susan Bale (Webmaster K-State Research and Extension), Betsy Cauble (faculty, Chair Coordinating Committee for People with Disabilities), Janelle Corkill (Webmaster K-State, state training) Larry Davis (faculty), Rebecca Gould (faculty, Acting Director iTAC), Jane Rowlett (campus ADA Coordinator), and Tom Schellhardt (Chair, IRMC) Definition Inclusion Criteria For classes that have been developed using K-State online, faculty will make accommodations on a course-by-course basis. Classes to be developed need to be designed based on accessibility guidelines. Any new web sites under construction must be accessible. Examples of Web Accessibility Issues Link text needs to be clear and able to stand on its own. For example, rather than using "click here" for the link, use "Undergraduate Catalog". (People using a screen reader can use the tab button to tab through the links. The reader then just reads the link text. If it only says, "click here" the browser will hot have enough information to click there.) Legislation Examples of Accessible Web Sites Current Plan and Future Suggestions Susan Bale is meeting with College of Agriculture Department Heads on October 2 to unveil her plan. She is compiling a book on accessibility. The Web Accessibility Committee would like to use this book in their educational materials. It was suggested that we develop a plan similar to implementing the Y2K Plan for the university. Jane will provide the process that was used during the next meeting. Members discussed developing an educational packet. Jane will provide the Y2K plan information to Janelle Corkill, who will organize the information for web accessibility and provide to the committee. The iTAC web site also will be used to provide accessibility training, however the iTAC website must first be accessible. Another suggestion was to determine a list of groups that need training. This included the Departmental Resource People. Monitoring and enforcement was yet another issue. Questions were raised on how to monitor and enforce this issue. This issue is of great concern considering the thousands of web pages related to university business. A check sheet with a sign off was discussed. Future plans included Portals. Those pages that want to come in under the portal must all be accessible. Overall it was decided that the committee would develop a university wide plan that includes electronic and face-to-face training, and a timeline and budget for implementation. Reading Materials Penalty and Deadline To be determined. |